Following up on last week’s post about being open-minded and inquisitive, my thoughts this week are a reflection about inter-religious understanding and collaboration.

Right now, on both sides of the Atlantic, fundamentalist religions’ polarization is fueling conflict and aggression. I am thinking about the politicization of Christianity with white Christian nationalism in the United States; the Hindutva movement in India leveraging Hindu identity to demonize and marginalize religious minorities; religious divisions within Europe concerning moral issues like LGBTQ+ rights;  the extreme religious polarization in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict; and the global impact of social media in fostering religious extremism by connecting like-minded extremist people across borders.

Inter-religious education, tolerance, and understanding are crucial for the survival of humanity. For our survival and that of our grandchildren.

As I have often stressed, theological understandings do change over time. My own theological understanding of world religions began to change when I was a budding theologian and was greatly influenced by Nostra Aetate the Second Vatican Council’s Declaration on Non-Christians issued on October 28, 1965.

“In our time,” Nostra Aetate stressed, “when day by day humankind is being drawn closer together, and the ties between different peoples are becoming stronger, the church examines more closely its relationship to non-Christian religions. In the church’s task of promoting unity and love among all men and women, indeed among all nations, it considers above all, in this declaration, what people have in common and what draws them to fellowship. One is the community of all peoples, one their origin, for God made the whole human race to live over the face of the earth. One also is their final goal: God. God’s providence, God’s manifestations of goodness, God’s saving design extended to all people.”

French sociologist Émile Durkheim (1858-1917), one of the principal architects of modern social science, argued that religion is the most fundamental social institution, and, in one form or another, will always be a part of social life. Today, some 85% of people around the globe identify with a religion. While there are around 10,000 distinct religions in the world today, over three-quarters of the global population adheres to one of these four – Christianity (31%), Islam (24%), Hinduism (15%), and Buddhism (7%).

Another 7% of the global population identify with religions with much smaller followings. Judaism, though one of the three major Abrahamic religions (along with Christianity and Islam) is represented by just 0.2% of the global population (15.8 million), most of whom reside in Israel (7.2 million) and the U.S.A. (7.5  million). Had the Holocaust not wiped out over a third of world Jewry during World War II, it is likely the Jewish population would be twice the size it is today.

While I remain a strongly committed Christian, my own theological understanding has moved well beyond religious exclusivism: the theological position that maintains the absolute necessity of faith in Christ for all people. Exclusivists insist that there is no salvation in non-Christian religions. This position, today, is most often identified with conservative evangelical Christians.

Considering the world’s religions, I suggest we have to work together in what some of my favorite late twentieth century theologians like Karl Rahner (1904-1984), Hans Küng (1928-2021), Edward Schillebeeckx (1914-2009), and David Tracy (1939-2025) have called religious pluralism. We need to move beyond a simple tolerance for other religions and develop a positive appreciation for what they have to offer.

It is not always easy to be accepting of other religions. A friend reminded me last week that it was ten years ago, on December 15, 2015, that Larycia Hawkins, the first female African-American tenured professor at the evangelical Christian college, Wheaton College, in Illinois, was suspended from her job as professor after she vowed to wear a hijab for Advent in solidarity with Muslims and created a social media storm by posting on Facebook that she agreed with Pope Francis that “Christians and Muslims worship the same God.”

On February 8, 2016, Wheaton College and Professor Hawkins issued a joint statement that they had “reached a confidential agreement under which they will part ways.” On March 3, 2016, the Institute for Advanced Studies in Culture at the University of Virginia announced that Lyricia Hawkins would be appointed as the the University of Virginia’s Abd el-Kader Visiting Faculty Fellow.

Lyricia Hawkins’ story was later documented in A New York Times Magazine feature, on October 13, 2016: “The Professor Wore a Hijab in Solidarity – Then Lost Her Job.”

Nevertheless, today we all need to move from just inter-religious tolerance to collaboration. From collaboration to genuine appreciation. From appreciation to learning from the other. We are all on this journey together.

Global understanding, anchored in inter-religious dialogue and appreciation, is essential for everyone’s life and future.

  • Jack

 

8 thoughts on “Inter-religious Understanding & Dialogue

  1. Dear Jack,
    Thank you, once again, for bringing us to a place that promotes healing and unity. When I see pictures from the James Webb telescope of the immensity and beauty of this wonderful universe, I try to imagine the God who created it. Then I wonder at our minute place in this grand scheme and marvel at the audacity of we mortals trying to define God. Yes, I truly believe in our Catholic/Christian faith but wonder how anyone on this tiny speck of rock can begin to think we can declare our beliefs to be exclusive and all-inclusive. God loves us ALL and no matter how we claim a unique relationship because of our beliefs, we can’t begin to scratch the surface of the Divinity. You have again opened us up to looking in the mirror and encouraged us to be better versions of ourselves. Bless you!
    Peace,
    Frank

  2. Of course, Jack, always a timely topic and helpful commentary. Being involved in both the Judeo-Catholic ecumenical exchange in the Archdiocese of Detroit in the 1980s, and now having a much broader understanding of the history of evolution/religious included, I think we might have to be in a posture of differentiation. I would suggest that it is most helpful to take the well-established religions with comprehensive theological foundations based on science (when myths are debunked) and holy books. Lutheran, Presbyterian, Methodist are among these, with Judaism an absolute given. There is another group, however, which is a more difficult challenge, i.e. the Evangelical Fundamentalist iterations. I classify these as storefront, profit/success, and the smaller self-taught preacher types. The unfortunate reality that we have fresh evidence to illustrate is that some among them preach racism, false Scriptural interpretations, and seek to establish the United States under their ideology. I believe that there must be a hard division with this group, dealing with them as targets of catechesis and evangelization, as they are today’s false prophets and chaos creators. Synodality makes a big deal of eliminating the silo approach to religion; that is great for the religions with established and solid documents. It is not possible to do likewise with this latter group as being sucked into things far from either the common or greater good is the end result.

  3. That is exceptional, Jack, and a sorely needed historical perspective on the problem. I do appreciate it and will share this with good friends.

    I recall that I had a good friend who went to preach to the Masaai in Africa. He told them all of the Old Testament stories, and the audience thoroughly enjoyed them. But then they told him they had their own stories. For hundreds of thousands of years the Masaai told the stories of their origins just as the Jewish people had. God gave birth to all living things. God gave all of the cattle on earth to the Masaai. And they are God’s chosen people. People did not die back then. But then a jealous wife failed to say the proper prayer for the infant of another wife – and the child died. That is how death came into the world.

    The Masaai have no written language. – but many oral stories of their origins and ethics – as does every people on the planet.

    Thanks for the lessen, as usual.

  4. Last night I attended an in- home prayer service for a friend’s father-in-law, who died last week in South Sudan. I was the only white person there and that could have felt quite alienating but the opposite was the case. As I don’t speak Dinka, I missed a lot of the speeches (and all of the jokes), but the gist of each speech was translated to me. I was invited to share some words of advice with the family and community, which I did. I was included, most marvellously included. And it was, language aside, very like an Irish wake ( minus the alcohol ). There were tears, laughter, the older ladies complained the speeches went on too long, some of the children got tired and ratty….
    With an open mind, our similarities, even in the face of our differences, are striking. Would that the world could experience what I did last night

Leave a reply to Frank Skeltis Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.