Last week my reflection was about Natural Law. This week, since many have asked me for more explanation, I offer a reflection about “being natural” and women priests in the Catholic Church. I did write about women priests a good eight years ago. But much has happened since then.
Today, October 15, 2021, I should also add that the National Catholic Reporter came out with an article yesterday about Anne Tropeano, or ‘Father Anne’, who blames God for leading her towards ordination. She will be ordained as a Roman Catholic woman priest in Albuquerque, NM on Saturday, October 16, 2021 at the Cathedral of St. John. Anne Tropeano holds a Master of Divinity from the Jesuit School of Theology in Berkeley, CA, and ministered with the Jesuits for twelve years. Recently profiled in The New Yorker, ‘Fr. Anne’ is quoted saying, “You say women can’t be priests? Watch me.”
I have to acknowledge, since I was overwhelmed by the revelation, that my first thought for this week’s post was to comment about the most recent devastating revelation about widespread clerical sexual abuse in France. The official report tells us that French Catholic clerics have abused more than 330,000 minors over the past 70 years. Terrible and unreal! The report is devastating and disgusting. I agree with historian and journalist Massimo Faggioli that this is the biggest RCC development since the sixteenth century Reformation. I am not ignoring it but will let others, like Massimo, follow up on that.
In my my post today, I want to change the conversation, shifting from wayward bishops and abusive clergy. They will all get what they deserve. And everyone needs to help the victims…
Today however I really want to focus on women’s ordination in my RCC Christian tradition. Life goes on. We need to build a better future; and women’s ordination is an essential part of that. As I write today, I am also very conscious of a wonderfully talented young woman priest, ordained recently and who celebrated her first mass this week.
First I offer a bit of older church history… In 1994, to officially stamp-out what he considered a rapidly spreading “deviant behavior” and unorthodox thought and teaching, Pope John Paul II declared women’s ordination a closed matter. In his letter Ordinatio Sacerdotalis, he wrote: “Wherefore, in order that all doubt may be removed regarding a matter of great importance…I declare that the Church has no authority whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women and that this judgment is to be definitively held by all the Church’s faithful.” The Roman Catholic prohibition of women’s ordination argued from a perception of divinely-constituted gender roles: the belief that masculinity was integral to the ministry of both Jesus and the apostles. Being a woman is fine, the churchmen said, but if a person is going to act “in persona Christi” (in the person of Christ) that person needs to have male genitalia.
Pope John Paul II, Pope Benedict XVI, and apparently Pope Francis have all believed, when it comes to priesthood, that there is an essential difference between being male and being female — i.e. that maleness is necessary for priesthood just as water is necessary for baptism. Why? Because, they argue, that’s the way the historical Jesus set it up. All of this is summed up in the Catechism of the Catholic Church (issued by Pope John Paul in 1992): “Only a baptized man (vir in Latin) validly receives sacred ordination.” The Lord Jesus chose men (viri) to form the college of the twelve apostles, and the apostles did the same when they chose collaborators to succeed them in their ministry. The college of bishops, with whom the priests are united in the priesthood, makes the college of the twelve an ever-present and ever-active reality until Christ’s return. The Church recognizes herself to be bound by this choice made by the Lord himself. For this reason the ordination of women is not possible.”
Interesting. I remember very clearly the official declaration of the Pontifical Biblical Commission in 1976 that no valid scriptural reason existed for not ordaining women. With all due respect, even popes need remedial theological education. Or they at least need well educated and up-to-date advisors and ghost writers.The Pontifical Biblical Commission was formally established by Pope Leo XIII (1810 – 1903) in October 1902. Its purpose was and has always been to ensure the proper Roman Catholic interpretation and defense of Sacred Scripture.
Very often those who oppose women’s ordination argue that Jesus chose only male disciples so therefore all priests and bishops must be men. The historical testimony, however, does not confirm this. The historical Jesus was not a male chauvinist.
Jesus’ disciples were a dynamic group of young men and women, most probably in their early or late teens. In the Hebrew tradition, we know that young men began studying under a rabbi when they were between ages 13 and 15. We know from the Martha/Mary account in Luke chapter 10 that Mary, sitting at the feet of Jesus, was truly a disciple.
In each of the Gospel accounts of Jesus’ Resurrection, there is a common thread: the first witnesses to the reality of the empty tomb were women.
Yes indeed, among Jesus’ disciples, later called apostles when sent out to preach the Good News, there were men and women. Certainly Mary the Magdalene was a key disciple and has often been called the “apostle to the apostles.” Paul, in his Letter to the Romans, refers to Priscilla and Aquila. He praises the woman Junia as a prominent apostle and Phoebe, a leader from the church at Cenchreae, a port city near Corinth.
As far as ordination is concerned, as I have often written, the historical Jesus did not ordain anyone. Ordination came several decades after Jesus’ Last Supper. When it was established, it was not about sacramental power. It was simply a form of quality control insuring qualified and competent ministers.
In the early Christian communities, long before ordination came into being, male and female leaders, selected by the communities, presided at Eucharistic celebrations. There were male and female ministerial leaders. Much later in the history of the church, misogyny slipped in and an all-male clerical culture took over. Priesthood then became male-hood.
A major development in the contemporary experience of women’s ordination came in 2002 with the ordination of the “Danube Seven” — a group of seven women from Germany, Austria and the United States who were validly ordained as priests on a ship cruising the Danube river on 29 June 2002. It was an historic moment. A year later, two of the original group were ordained bishops.
Today, RCWP (Roman Catholic Women Priests) and ARCWP (Association of Roman Catholic Women Priests) are two branches that have developed from the ordination of the seven women on the Danube. Both groups have members in the USA and both are international. RCWP women priests and bishops minister in over 34 USA states and are also present in Canada, Europe, South and Central America, South Africa, the Philippines, and Taiwan. Today there are 270 Women Priests and 15 Women Bishops worldwide.
Prophetic movements, like RCWP, always shake-up institutional managers. That of course is often a good thing. The prophetic leaders who condone women’s ordination often incur excommunication. In every institution it takes time for top management to acknowledge and appreciate the change makers. Even the historical Jesus discovered this in his early thirties.
Looking historically at how change occurs in the Roman Catholic tradition, we see a three stage development: (1) When a big change starts, the change is condemned. (2) Later, if the change continues to develop and prosper, it is officially “tolerated” and often as “an experiment.” (3) Finally, once the change is fully established and flourishing, it is labeled “good and truly a part of our tradition.” As they say, hope springs eternal. As I would say – Yes. The Women Priests movement proves it is happening.
13 thoughts on “Catholic Women Priests”
Jack, this is great. We are fortunate to have the Community of Saint Bridget locally, led by Bishop Mary Collingwood. And some women priests. Someday I hope to be a part of their community, but as of now I don’t have the intestinal fortitude to do so. The Spirit is alive and active.
Give God the glory. Great things he has done.
Jack, I knew about the Danube 7, I had no idea there is a larger group of women priests. I was going to write “so many” but that wont describe them until there ARE so many. Thanks for the information. Let’s hope phase three arrives within our lifetimes.
Absolutely…Warmest regards Jan.
I continue to pray for this. I would love to find a RC community, led by a Woman Priest, near me. I would run to it.
Our new pastor is married with 2 children. As a cradle Catholic of 81 years I am delighted to see this small sign of progress. It may be too much hope that I might yet experience a woman deacon or a woman priest but I still remain hopeful.
A step that would promote the movement toward women priests would be the ordination of women deacons. The Amazon Synod clearly stated that this is a great need in their region. Already in the Church women hold positions of great authority as educators, principals of schools, administrators of hospitals, presidents of universities, administrators of parishes, heads of religious orders, etc.. Why should they be denied the acknowledgement of their roles in ministry by denying them ordination as deacons? Pope Francis continues to waffle on this issue. Hopefully, the two year synod, which opened in Rome last week will nudge him in the right direction. The need is there and the qualified people are ready.
I am in complete agreement. Thanks Dennis
I, naively, was not aware that the ordination of women priests had progressed so far in the church. I have no doubt that, should there be a community lead by female priests nearby here in Michigan, it would be well received and grow exponentially. It is encouraging that “radical” ideas such as women priests and married priests do not cause the scandal today that might have happened years ago. Isn’t it funny that some of our hierarchy view Jesus as a “just,” a.k.a. vengeful, God rather than the loving God who invites us all. How can being non-male be viewed as an exclusion from priesthood and cause for division? I hope that we all who read your words will someday have the opportunity to live in a united community that looks like all of us without division. Thanks for your encouraging words!
Thanks Frank. Slowly we DO make progress.
There was once a thelogical tradition that the Jews had been superseded as God’s chosen people with the development of the Christian people being of mixed Jewish & Gentile origins.
Perhaps due to clericalism & sexual abuse, the all male clergy will be superseded by a mixed sex clergy in the future RCC!!
Many thanks Kay. For a variety of reasons the all male clergy is on the way out. I have no doubts.