A sacrament, coming from the Latin word sacrare meaning “to consecrate,” is not so much something one receives but a symbolic ritual in which one participates. Each sacrament dramatizes and points to something that is happening in the lives of people who belong to the Christian community. They live in the spirit of Jesus because they have been graced and have become a cause of grace in others.They grow in their understanding of what Jesus meant when he said: “Love one another as I have loved you.” Grace is a quality of life not a spiritual thing that one gets and builds up like a spiritual investment portfolio.
The word “baptism” is derived from Latin and Greek words meaning to immerse or to plunge, as in water. Historically people have participated in baptism by being dipped or immersed in water, having water poured on their heads, or even just splashing some water on the head of the person being baptized.
John the Baptizer
John the Baptizer was an itinerant Hebrew preacher active in the area of the Jordan River. John used baptism as the central symbol of his pre-messianic movement. In the first chapter, the Fourth Gospel describes John the Baptizer as “a man sent from God” who “was not the light,” but “came as a witness, to bear witness to the light, so that through him everyone might believe.” Most scholars agree that John baptized Jesus and that certainly some of Jesus’ disciples had been participants in John the Baptizer’s religious movement. John acknowledged that Jesus, the one who would come after him, would not baptize with water but with the Holy Spirit (Mark 1:8). Around 30 CE, John the Baptizer was sentenced to death and subsequently beheaded by Herod Antipas (born before 20 BCE – died after 39 CE) who officially ruled Galilee.
The ritual performed by John the Baptizer is mentioned in each of the four Gospels. Being baptized by John demonstrated a desire to refocus one’s life and make a commitment to follow God’s law in anticipation of the Messiah’s arrival. The ritual is never described in detail, because it was commonly performed in a river or nearby pool and entailed full or partial immersion.
For Jesus, his baptism marked a moment of personal discernment and preparation for his own public ministry, which was far greater than the ministry of John the Baptizer. Mark, Matthew, and Luke depict the baptism in parallel passages. In all three Synoptic Gospels the Holy Spirit is depicted as descending upon Jesus immediately after his baptism accompanied by a voice from Heaven. Mark and Luke record the voice as addressing Jesus by saying “You are my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.” In Matthew the voice states “This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.” (Mark 1:9–11; Luke 3:21–23; Matthew 3:13–17) After his baptism, Jesus withdrew to the Judean desert to fast and pray for forty days.
Baptism and the Jesus Movement
That a ritual immersion in water was important in the earliest decades of the Jesus movement is clear from the many references to it in the New Testament. When Paul speaks of being “immersed in one spirit” and “into one body,” he is talking about the ritual’s marking an entrance into the community and sharing a communal spirit (1 Corinthians 12:13). But for Paul, the body into which they have been immersed is not just a group or social body. It is also the Body of Christ, for it is united and animated by the spirit of the risen Lord (1 Corinthians 12:12–27). Paul did not develop an elaborate theology of baptism. Borrowing from Hebrew ideas with which he was familiar, Paul saw it as a symbolic immersion and an initiation not only into the community of believers but into the very way of life that Jesus himself had lived.
The understanding and practice of baptism developed greatly in the third century. By the fourth and fifth centuries, however, baptism had become a several-weeks-long exercise involving prayer, instruction, and learning the creed: all leading up to the actual baptismal washing on Easter. The ceremony was usually conducted by the overseer, the bishop, of the Christian community. The word “overseer,” episcopus in Latin, comes from the Greek words epí meaning “over” and skopós meaning “watcher.” In English the word evolved into “bishop.” (The Latin episcopus, became the Old English biscop. Then Middle English bisshop and lastly bishop.)
Those to be baptized at Easter disrobed, were anointed with oil, renounced the devil, confessed their faith in the Trinity, and were then immersed in water. They were then anointed by the overseer (bishop) with special holy oil (chrism), received the laying on of hands by the bishop, and were dressed in white. They were then led to join the congregation for the Easter Eucharist celebration.
Infant Baptism and Augustine of Hippo
Although some infants were being baptized in the third and fourth centuries, infant baptism did not really become widespread until the fifth century, thanks to the introduction of his Original Sin understanding by Bishop Augustine of Hippo.
Augustine of Hippo (354 – 430 CE), also known as Saint Augustine, was a theologian and the bishop of Hippo Regius, the ancient name of the modern city of Annaba, Algeria.
As a young man Augustine had an active hedonistic sexual lifestyle. He had at least one child born out of wedlock, via a concubine with whom he lived for more than fifteen years. He never married. It was in 386 at the age of 31, however, that he became strongly anti-sex Platonic and converted to Christianity. He and his son, Adeodatus (372–388 CE), which means “Gift from God,” were baptized in 387 by Bishop Aurelius Ambrose of Milan (c. 339 – c. 397 CE).
Augustine’s creation: Original Sin
For many traditionalist Christians, the doctrine of “Original Sin” is firm and definite. In fact, however, there are no biblical and no historical indications that Jesus knew of or believed this doctrine. Neither did the early church. Original Sin is a theological construct created by Augustine of Hippo in the late fourth century.
Augustine was the first theological author to use the phrase “original sin” (Latin: peccatum originale). Most contemporary biblical scholars consider Adam and Eve mythic figures in the Hebrew Bible’s creation myth. Augustine, however, considered Adam and Eve real historical people who were responsible for what he called the “Original Sin” by which all humans, through sexual intercourse, inherited a tainted nature. Augustine identified male semen as the means by which original sin was inherited and passed on. He stressed however that the historic Jesus of Nazareth was free of Original Sin because he was conceived without any semen.
Augustine believed that sexual desire itself was a consequence of Original Sin. Most importantly for its impact on baptism, Augustine held that unbaptized infants went straight to hell as a consequence of Original Sin. He therefore became a strong advocate of infant baptism. In the church, thanks to Augustine, infant baptism would become the norm for baptisms.
Quite honestly, Augustine’s understanding of human sexuality and his introduction of the Original Sin doctrine were problematic theological aberrations.
Returning to Adult Baptism
Some post-Reformation Christian traditions strongly rejected infant baptism. The Anabaptists, started in 1527 by Michael Sattler, believe that baptism is valid only when candidates freely confess their faith in Christ and request to be baptized. (The word “Anabaptist” comes from the Greek word ana meaning “again” as in “baptized again.”) Anabaptist groups still present today are mainly the Amish, the Brethren, and the Mennonites.
Other contemporary Christian traditions, of course, stress the importance of adult believer’s baptism. “Baptists” form a major branch of Evangelical Christianity distinguished by baptizing adult professing Christian believers and doing so by immersion. The earliest “Baptist” church was started in 1609 in Amsterdam with the English Separatist John Smyth as its pastor. In 1638, Roger Williams, who founded Providence Plantations, established the first Baptist congregation in the North American colonies.
Baptism as initiation into the community
In many ways I can resonate with the stress on adult baptism but doubt very much that infant baptism will disappear. Regardless, baptism is an initiation into the community of faith. The communIty of believers, therefore, has a major responsibility to support and promote the healthy Christian development of all of its members. Just as parents, family, and friends promote the physical, mental, and intellectual development of babies and children, so too parents, family, and Christian communities bear a heavy responsibility to promote and support the Christian faith and values development of their babies and children.
As a former catechetical teacher, parish religious education director, and professor of historical theology for many years, I have always considered confirmation a sacrament in search of its identity.
In many Christian denominations, such as the Anglican, Lutheran, Methodist and Reformed traditions, confirmation is a rite that often includes a profession of faith by an already baptized person. In the Catholic tradition, according to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, “…reception of the sacrament of Confirmation is necessary for the completion of baptismal grace.” Confirmation is not practiced in Baptist, Anabaptist, and other Christian traditions that stress the importance of believer’s adult baptism.
When it started
Confirmation as a separate sacramental ritual in western Christianity did not exist before the third century. And, it did not become a regular practice in Europe until after the fifth century. What was originally a bishop’s blessing administered after baptism, later became separated from the water ritual.
When Christianity became the official religion of the Roman Empire in 380 CE, there were, rather quickly, more baptisms than a single bishop in each city could handle. Presbyters (priests) were then allowed to do the baptizing but only the bishop was allowed to “confirm” the baptisms. Many people really did not see the necessity of this confirmation. For the most part it fell into disuse.
In the ninth century, however, reform-minded French bishops made an attempt to revive confirmation, suggesting that it bestowed the gifts of the Holy Spirit. Nevertheless, by the twelfth century, confirmation was mostly received by those who wanted to enter clerical orders.
In 1563 the Counter-Reformation Council of Trent stressed the importance of the Sacrament of Confirmation because the bishops believed it was established by the historical Jesus and had the following effects on the confirmed person: (1) an increase of sanctifying grace which makes the recipient a “perfect Christian;” (2) a special sacramental grace consisting in the seven gifts of the Holy Spirit; and (3) an indelible character by reason of which the sacrament cannot be received again by the same person. Trent and later RCC regulations made confirmation a requirement before entering into marriage or holy orders.
Over the centuries confirmation has gone through a number of changes in understanding and ceremonies. Some bishops say it should be received very close to baptism. Others say close to one’s first communion. And yet others advocate it as an adolescent faith commitment ritual, like a Christian Bar or Bat Mitzvah – a coming of age ceremony for boys and girls when they reach the age of 12 or 13. As friend, Joe Martos, often said: “Theologians today are hard put to say which is the meaning of the sacrament…”
Celebrating lived realities
Meaningful sacraments are not those that just celebrate beliefs but those that truly celebrate lived realities. If confirmation is truly a rite of passage, it needs to facilitate or at least to celebrate a genuine change in people’s lives.
Before confirmation, children are told that they are going to receive the gift of the Holy Spirit, even if they get nothing out of the ceremony. So how does confirmation today truly become and celebrate a genuine change in people’s lives?
A dynamic and meaningful confirmation should connect people, whatever their age, with an experienced spiritual reality: an experience of the Sacred in the depth of our human lives and in the natural world. Such an experience gives people what we so desperately need today: faith, hope, courage, optimism, truthfulness, patience, reliability, and trust. Perhaps we all need to spend more time studying and reflecting on Christian spirituality.
Next week, some reflections about penance and reconciliation.
14 thoughts on “Baptism and Confirmation”
Hi Jack, interesting article as always. I have a question about the understanding of Confirmation being a ‘confirming of baptism’.
Growing up in Belgium in the 1970s my RC Belgian friends and neighbours, aged about 12/13 would have a big celebration of a sacrament they called ‘Grand (big) Communion’ as opposed to the ‘Petit (small) Communion’ they had participated in when smaller and younger aged 6 or 7.
‘Grand Communion’ involved girls in white (wedding-type) dresses with veils and boys in formal suits and ties. It was a huge celebration involving family and friends gathering to all proceed in stately fashion to the Church, followed by a big party, big food buffet and plenty of beer and wine, on into the evening.
I couldn’t work out why I was not having a sacrament called ‘Grand Communion’, celebrating Communion in a big way, and I was somewhat envious of their huge parties. My friends couldn’t understand why I was having a sacrament that related to confirming the baptismal vows made on my behalf when I was a baby, rather than building on and solidifying my Petit/small/First Communion event.
Is this a simply a difference in wording and colloquial mid-late 20th Belgian Francophone language compared to British and American English languag, or is there something else in terms of cultural practises or even theological differences between the RCC in Belgium versus the UK and USA in the 1970s that I haven’t quite grasped?
In general solemn communion is a celebration of communion but with mire catechesis and as you say a great celebration. I remember my son being a bit upset that all his friend’s had solemn communions but he didn’t. 😀 I have read that occasionally solemn communion is linked with confirmation but that is not what usually happens.
Thank you so very much for a more enlightened, spiritual and scholarly teaching than that contained in the catechism. Jack, each of your essays is a treasure to be reread and contemplated.
I have been impressed by the Church’s preparation for Confirmation that developed lately. The candidates all do some community action in preparation for the sacrament. I think it suggests that Confirmation is the sacracrament in which the Christian takes on the vocation of working or transforming the world through their graceful existence as you described it at the beginning of your essay. Driving a truck delivering food, nursing the sick in the hospital, directing traffic in the city, plowing the fields on the farm, standing in defense of one’s country, teaching kids how to read, stocking the shelves in the supermarket, doing your neighbors tax return, and on and on it goes when we stop to think of how we are graced by the work of others and we in turn are able to grace others. The Christian understands the meaning of their work, but even if we do not, it still matters. Work that sustains life as opposed to behavior that makes life ugly is the matter of this sacarament. Your presentation of the sacraments that is showing how they developed over time is fascinating. Something may be developing here around Confirmation.
I think you are correct Tom!
Your insights should be part and parcel of every “religion” class for both children and adults. This clarification makes me ponder the commitment and input of the participant. As much as I understand baptism of infants, I see the point of having an active choice in reception of the sacrament. Confirmation seems even more essential to have the “confirmand” have a say in the process. I vividly remember my confirmation and still feel that it was my decision, not something that happened because I was of a certain age and it was time for that event. Although there is some order to have ritual dates for sacraments, there are valid reasons for one to be mentally/spiritually ready for their reception. I love the notion that one makes an active choice to move to the next stage in one’s spiritual life. Chronological order and timing seems less sensible when dealing with divine interactions. You have given us another gem.
Many thanks Frank!
Thanks for your reflections on the sacraments. How much we have forgotten and yet to learn again through new insights.
“Grace is a quality of life not a spiritual thing that one gets and builds up like a spiritual investment portfolio.
Perhaps we all need to spend more time studying and reflecting on Christian spirituality.”
Your two insights above are spot on.
Thank you Joe!
But what is the theological understanding behind the practise of many Eastern rite churches that give the infant Baptism, Confirmation & communion all at the same time??
Just a different tradition. They want the babies to be “fully initiated into the Christian community.” At some point those people when older still need to make a conscious commitment. My preferebce, but it will not happen, would be to not baptize babies but have a naming ceremony and blessing. Then let them make a baptismal commitment when they know what they are doing…
So agree, Jack, as I do not accept Augustine’s definition of “Original Sin” because I believe Adam and Eve to be mythical people. Thanks.